Old Georgetown Appendix
22 January 2009

RECOMMENDATION: No objection to issuance of permit for proposed alterations, including new storefront with bay window projections into public space, second floor windows/doors, and skylight, as shown in supplemental drawings dated 16 January 2009 which indicate retention of south wall and roof structure. New rooftop mechanical equipment must be located as to not be visible from public thoroughfare. New brick pavers on sidewalk must match existing pavers used on the DDOT Wisconsin Avenue Streetscape Project. Note: Any subsequent modifications to the exterior design made during DCRA technical review must be re-submitted to the Commission for approval prior to issuance of permit.

RECOMMENDATION: Returned without Action. Concept application for rear dormer and alterations has been inactive for a period of time.

RECOMMENDATION: Returned without Action. Concept application for alterations and addition to carriage house of rear alley was withdrawn by written request of applicant.

RECOMMENDATION: The Commission regrets that several window openings were completed prior to review or permit and notes that the District Government issued a stop work order on 22 August 2007 and that a skylight and areaway alterations were thereafter completed without review or permit. The Commission remains concerned that the front facade of this significant building has been compromised during this period of unpermitted construction, as evidenced by observable continued settling. No objection to issuance of permit for proposed wood window and door, skylight, mechanical and areaway alterations at rear, and new hand-crimped copper roofs at historic ell and raised roofs at 1980s rear additions, as shown in supplemental drawings received and dated 15 January 2009. Note: Any subsequent modifications to the exterior design made during DCRA technical review must be re-submitted to the Commission for approval prior to issuance of permit.

RECOMMENDATION: Returned without Action. Front and side replacement windows were omitted from the submission and a site visit of 29 December 2008 indicated that the rear windows are not visible from a public thoroughfare. Refer to the Historic Preservation Review Board.

RECOMMENDATION: No objection to issuance of permit for proposed shed woven fabric awning with lettering on slope no taller than 8-inches high reading: "Fresh" as shown in supplemental drawings dated 29 December 2008 PROVIDED attachments are made into mortar joints only. Note: Any subsequent modifications to the exterior design made during DCRA technical review must be re-submitted to the Commission for approval prior to issuance of permit.

RECOMMENDATION: No objection to issuance of permit for proposed replacement of shutters with wood paneled shutters using existing hardware. Note: Any subsequent modifications to the exterior design made during DCRA technical review must be re-submitted to the Commission for approval prior to issuance of permit.

RECOMMENDATION: No objection to issuance of permit for proposed woven fabric awning with lettering on 6-inch valance reading: "Tretorn" to replace awning installed non-compliant to approved design. Frame must be attached through mortar joints only. Note: Any subsequent modifications to the exterior design made during DCRA technical review must be re-submitted to the Commission for approval prior to issuance of permit.

RECOMMENDATION: No objection to permit for alterations to porch enclosure and balconies with 5/4" wood balusters as shown in supplemental drawings received 22 December 2008. Note: Any subsequent modifications to the exterior design made during DCRA technical review must be re-submitted to the Commission for approval prior to issuance of permit.

RECOMMENDATION: Returned without Action. Permit application for repairs to front and alterations was withdrawn by written request of applicant.

RECOMMENDATION: The Commission regrets that removal of brick on front facade was initiated prior to review or permit. No objection to issuance of permit for proposed replacement of face brick which must match dimensions of historic brick. Installation must combine re-usable original brick with new. Mortar joint composition and dimensions must match original coursing for the tooth-in of the bricks. Recommend AGAINST the installation of shutters on the front facade.

RECOMMENDATION: The Commission regrets that the fence was installed prior to review or permit. No objection to issuance of permit for existing vertical board wood fence without horizontal trim boards as shown in supplemental documentation dated 22 January 2009. Fence must be stained or painted. Note: Any subsequent modifications to the exterior design made during DCRA technical review must be re-submitted to the Commission for approval prior to issuance of permit.

RECOMMENDATION: No objection to concept design development details for proposed canted glass wall and zinc roof alterations at entrance link as shown in supplemental drawings received and dated 30 December 2008. Recommend further study of color of zinc, clear glass, alternate fret pattern, minimal horizontal mullions, beltcourse extension, and door at roof. Provide color options in concrete specifications. File new submission of working drawings, including details and dimensions, with permit application for review by the Commission when ready.

RECOMMENDATION: The Commission regrets that windows were replaced and alterations completed prior to review or permit. No objection to issuance of permit for proposed alterations for single-hung 1/1 wood windows as shown in drawings dated 19 December 2008. Note: Any subsequent modifications to the exterior design made during DCRA technical review must be re-submitted to the Commission for approval prior to issuance of permit.

RECOMMENDATION: No objection to issuance of permit for proposed revisions to approved permit including aluminum trellis, back-lit signs reading "TD Bank", paving materials, concrete curb and additional landscaping. Note: Any subsequent modifications to the exterior design made during DCRA technical review must be re-submitted to the Commission for approval prior to issuance of permit.

RECOMMENDATION: Recommend AGAINST concept design for partial demolition of brick garden wall and for new brick piers, wood fence and alcove for trash containers as proposed. Existing brick fence must be retained in place. No objection to new wood fence at corner with heritage elm tree, which is to be protected. No objection to concept of alterations to brick panel next to garage for new entrance to rear yard. File new submission of working drawings, including details and dimensions, for a revised design with permit application for review by the Commission when ready.

RECOMMENDATION: Recommend AGAINST concept design for addition and alterations to rear as proposed. Recommend recess at demarcation of existing rear wall and new addition, which should have a lower roof line. File new submission of working drawings, including details and dimensions, with permit application for revised design for review by the Commission when ready.

RECOMMENDATION: Returned without Action. Submitted materials and a site visit of 23 December 2008 indicate that proposed two-story rear addition will not be visible from a public thoroughfare. Refer to the Historic Preservation Review Board.

RECOMMENDATION: No objection to concept design for proposed alterations and additions at first and third floor levels as shown in supplemental drawings dated 8 January 2009 which indicate window on party wall, light fixtures at each side of the masonry opening at every level. Recommend mechanical equipment on roof be located so that it will not be visible from public thoroughfare. File new submission of working drawings, including details and dimensions, with permit application for review by the Commission when ready.

RECOMMENDATION: No objection to concept design for new 12-light wood door in existing opening at 1940s addition, as shown in drawings received and dated 19 December 2008. File new submission of working drawings, including details and dimensions, with permit application for review by the Commission when ready.