Old Georgetown Appendix: CFA Meeting — 20 May 2010

Returned without Action. Although concept design was not approved as proposed, the case was superseded by concept case OG 10-145.

No objection to concept design for enclosed roof terrace as indicated in supplemental drawings received and dated 22 April 2010. File new submission of working drawings, including details and dimensions, with permit application for review by the Commission.

No objection to concept design for new fourth story addition to this non-contributing residence. Addition to incorporate either five multi-light double-hung windows with transoms or three pairs of single light casements with transoms as shown in supplemental drawings received and dated 20 April 2010. File new submission of working drawings, including details and dimensions, with permit application for review by the Commission.

Returned without Action. Concept application for new bay at side was withdrawn by written request by the applicant.

No objection to issuance of permit for proposed 7ft high replacement wood fence and gate as shown in supplemental drawings dated 20 April 2010 which indicates staggered board design. Fence and gate must be stained. Note: Any subsequent modifications to the exterior design made during DCRA technical review must be re-submitted to the Commission for approval prior to issuance of permit.

No objection to issuance of permit for proposed reproduction sash for windows on second floor bay and on first floor as shown in supplemental information received and dated 23 April 2010 which indicate replica will match detailing of original windows on the rest of the house, which are being repaired. Note: Any subsequent modifications to the exterior design made during DCRA technical review must be re-submitted to the Commission for approval prior to issuance of permit.

No objection to issuance of permit for proposed retrofitting of existing windows in this 1935 building with insulated glass and for new paneled shutters as shown in supplemental drawings received and dated 23 April 2010. The approval is for this location only as each proposal is reviewed on a case by case basis. Note: Any subsequent modifications to the exterior design made during DCRA technical review must be re-submitted to the Commission for approval prior to issuance of permit.

The Commission regrets that projecting signs were installed prior to review. No objection to issuance of permit for replacement signs with lettering and logo for 'Papyrus' PROVIDED they are mounted to wall at either side of corner entrance, and for lettering on shop windows as shown in supplemental drawings received and dated 18 May 2010. Existing projecting signs were not approved, were deleted from this permit application, and must be removed no later than 31 August 2010. Note: Any subsequent modifications to the exterior design made during DCRA technical review must be re-submitted to the Commission for approval prior to issuance of permit.

No objection to issuance of permit for proposed replacement 7-ft high vertical board double faced wood fence as shown in supplemental drawings received and dated 19 April 2010 which indicate supports will not be visible. Fence must be stained or painted. Note: Any subsequent modifications to the exterior design made during DCRA technical review must be re-submitted to the Commission for approval prior to issuance of permit.

No objection to issuance of permit for projecting sign mounted at second floor level with lettering reading 'Do's Custom Tailor' as shown in supplemental drawings received and dated 22 April 2010. Wall mounted flat sign above second floor windows was not approved and was deleted from this permit application. Note: Any subsequent modifications to the exterior design made during DCRA technical review must be re-submitted to the Commission for approval prior to issuance of permit.

No objection to issuance of permit for proposed installation of three new dish antennas for ClearWire mounted to penthouse and painted to match color of wall behind each. Sled mounted antennas were not approved and were deleted from this permit application. Note: Any subsequent modifications to the exterior design made during DCRA technical review must be re-submitted to the Commission for approval prior to issuance of permit.

No objection to issuance of permit for raising of garage roof and new awning windows in existing flat-roof garage as shown in drawings received and dated 20 April 2010. Note: Any subsequent modifications to the exterior design made during DCRA technical review must be re-submitted to the Commission for approval prior to issuance of permit.

Returned without Action. Submitted materials and a site visit of 20 April 2010 indicate that proposed one-story rear addition will not be visible from a public thoroughfare. Refer to the Historic Preservation Review Board. Note that application is a re-submission of an approved design reviewed under cases OG 05-060 and OG 05-081, except that alterations to the side wall visible from the street were completed as part of the previous permit. Note, existing shed on rear yard visible through the gap between buildings was completed prior to review or permit and must be removed no later than 31 July 2010.

No objection to concept design for new 'Madewell' painted sign with 14-inch tall 'M' over doors, transom windows with interior applied muntins, and removal of lights on building as shown in drawings received and dated 16 April 2010. File new submission of working drawings, including details and dimensions, with permit application for review by the Commission.

No objection to issuance of permit for new bi-fold single-light wood windows and new single light wood door at southwest corner of building in existing masonry openings as shown in drawings received and dated 22 April 2010. Note: Any subsequent modifications to the exterior design made during DCRA technical review must be re-submitted to the Commission for approval prior to issuance of permit.

No objection to revised design for alterations to rear wall for sliding gates and parking pad. Letter from arborist indicates minimal or no impact to root zone of neighbor's elm tree. Gate will be painted. Note: Any subsequent modifications to the exterior design made during DCRA technical review must be re-submitted to the Commission for approval prior to issuance of permit.

Returned without Action. Submitted materials and a site visit in association with previous review under case OG 10-090 indicate that proposed alterations to entrance porch and to garden walls on front yard, as shown in supplemental drawings received and dated 22 April 2010, will not be visible from a public thoroughfare. Refer to the Historic Preservation Review Board.

No objection to concept design for proposed alterations, including removal of brick garden wall, installation of new gates, brick piers to match existing and changes to courtyards. File new submission of detailed and dimensioned drawings with permit application for review by the Commission.

No objection to concept design for proposed restoration of metal fire escape ladder as shown in supplemental drawings received and dated 22 April 2010. File new submission of detailed and dimensioned drawings with permit application for review by the Commission. Recommend revisions to the design of existing deck to a more traditional detailing.

Returned without Action. Submitted materials and a site visit of 21 April 2010 indicate that proposed alterations to rear, as shown in supplemental drawings received and dated 21 April 2010, will not be visible from a public thoroughfare. Note that removal of original masonry wall within bay window will be visible from street and that Commission's approval of construction of bay window under case OG 97-039 was conditional on retention of 'existing masonry wall [which] is not to be altered'. See copy of previous recommendation. Refer to the Historic Preservation Review Board.

No objection to issuance of permit for proposed alterations to front porch, door and entrance walk as shown in drawings received and dated 19 April 2010.

No objection to concept design for third floor rear addition as indicated in drawings received and dated 23 April 2010. File new submission of working drawings, including details and dimensions, with permit application for review by the Commission.

No objection to proposed revision to approved design to widen brick chimney on rear addition. See previous review under case OG 10-089. Note: Any subsequent modifications to the exterior design made during DCRA technical review must be re-submitted to the Commission for approval prior to issuance of permit.

Returned without Action. Submitted materials indicate that proposed alterations to window opening on side wall of rear ell will not be visible from public thoroughfare. Refer to the Historic Preservation Review Board.

Returned without Action. Property is outside of the jurisdiction of the Old Georgetown Act.

Returned without Action. Permit application for replacement siding and new lattice screen was withdrawn by written request of applicant. The Commission regrets that partial repair / replacement of historic siding with new wood siding has been completed prior to review or permit. Any additional removal of historic fabric for replacement with new siding must be submitted for review prior to initiating work.

No objection to issuance of permit for proposed alterations, including removal of brick garden wall, installation of new wood gates, brick piers to match existing and changes to courtyards as shown in drawings received and dated 20 May 2010 which conform to approved concept design (see OG 10-139). Note: Any subsequent modifications to the exterior design made during DCRA technical review must be re-submitted to the Commission for approval prior to issuance of permit.