Shipstead-Luce Appendix: CFA Meeting — 21 September 2006

Recommend AGAINST the issuance of permit for proposed temporary signs as shown in materials received and dated 7 July 2006. Recommend a sign with opaque face that is halo lighted.

No objection to the issuance of permit for a partial replacement of windows shown in supplemental materials received and dated 11 August 2006. Replacement of windows should only be done in locations where wood windows have previously been replaced. In other locations with existing wood windows, the windows should be restored and returned to their original location.

Postponed at the request of applicant.

Returned without comment. Property is outside the jurisdiction of the Commission of Fine Arts and therefore not subject to review.

No objection to the issuance of permit for proposed new antennas for Cingular Wireless, as shown in materials received and dated 8 September 2006.

Recommend AGAINST the issuance of permit new generator with concrete pad and fencings as shown in drawings received and dated 8 September 2006. Recommend researching alternate locations for proposed generator in order that the equipment does not intrude on available green space. File new proposal with permit application when ready.

No objection to the issuance of permit for proposed new fence as shown in supplemental materials received and dated 22 August 2006, provided the fence is constructed of metal pickets with straight gates at requested openings.

No objection to the issuance of permit for replacement handrail as shown in drawings received and dated 11 August 2006, provided the new handrail is a replacement in-kind.

Postponed at the request of the applicant.

Returned without comment. Property is outside the jurisdiction of the Commission of Fine Arts and therefore not subject to review.

Returned without comment. Property is outside the jurisdiction of the Commission of Fine Arts and therefore not subject to review.

Returned without comment. Property is outside the jurisdiction of the Commission of Fine Arts and therefore not subject to review.

Returned without comment. Property is outside the jurisdiction of the Commission of Fine Arts and therefore not subject to review.

No objection to the issuance of permit for new timber retaining wall and solid board fence as shown in supplemental materials received and dated 18 September 2006.

Recommend AGAINST the issuance of permit for a replacement fence as shown in materials received and dated 8 September 2006, due to lack of information. Submit complete fence proposal including photographs of house, proposed fence location, and context with drawings showing style of proposed fence permit application for review when ready.

No objection to the issuance of permit for a replacement fence as shown in supplemental materials received and dated 18 September 2006.

No objection to the issuance of permit for proposed 12-story office building as shown in materials received and dated 8 September 2006. Project complies with previously approved master plan (SL Case 02-090).

No objection to the issuance of permit for proposed 12-story office building as shown in materials received and dated 8 September 2006. Project complies with previously approved master plan (SL Case 02-090).

No objection to the issuance of permit for replacement fence as shown in drawings received and dated 8 September 2006, provided the new fence is a replacement in-kind.

Postponed at the request of applicant.

No objection to the issuance of permit for a new retaining walls and patio as shown in supplemental materials received and dated 18 September 2006. Any future proposal for a rear yard fence enclosure must be submitted to the Commission of Fine Arts for review.

No objection to the issuance of permit for proposed reflecting pool as shown in drawings received and dated 8 September 2006. Recommend AGAINST the issuance of permit for substitution of roof material from artificial slate to shingles as shown in drawings received and dated 8 September 2006. Proposed material is an unacceptable substitution for approved roof material.

Property to be reviewed by direct submission as property is owned and managed by the District of Columbia. See Direct Submission Consent Calendar for recommended action.

Recommend AGAINST the issuance of permit for proposed permanent signs as shown in materials received and dated 8 September 2006. Recommend that type size and height of canopy is the same for both signs and the use of slightly projected metal face letters with halo lighting. Applicant is also requested to submit update on proposal for window signs/artwork. Submit revised proposal with new permit application when ready.

Property to be reviewed by direct submission as property is owned and managed by the District of Columbia. See Direct Submission Consent Calendar for recommended action.

Property to be reviewed by direct submission as property is owned and managed by the District of Columbia. See Direct Submission Consent Calendar for recommended action.

Returned without comment. Property is outside the jurisdiction of the Commission of Fine Arts and therefore not subject to review.

No objection the issuance of permit for the reverse channel illuminated sign and vinyl coating with signature detail as shown in supplemental drawings received and dated 19 September 2006. Recommend AGAINST the issuance of permit for the awnings and menu box as shown in drawings received and dated 8 September 2006. Recommend elimination of lettering on awnings and removal of menu box. Submit revised proposal with new permit application when ready.

No objection to the issuance of permit for the alterations and repairs to existing entrance and addition of retaining wall as shown in supplemental drawings received and dated 18 September 2006 provided the retaining wall is level and does not exceed 42 inches from the sidewalk grade at its tallest point. Suggest the extension of wall around the corner of the property at 32nd Street, if possible. Any additional work performed in the landscape or to the exterior of the house must be submitted to the Commission of Fine Arts for review.

Property to be reviewed by direct submission as property is owned and managed by the District of Columbia.

Returned without comment. Property is outside the jurisdiction of the Commission of Fine Arts and therefore not subject to review.

No objection to the issuance of permit for the proposed non-illuminated sign as shown in drawings received and dated 11 September 2006.