Other Submissions: OGB Meeting — 2 June 2016

Returned without Action. Permit application for site work has been inactive for an extended period of time.

Returned without Action. Supplemental materials received 7 June 2016 locating proposed mechanical equipment at grade at rear yard, and site visit on 9 June 2016 indicate that equipment would not be visible from a public thoroughfare. Refer to the Historic Preservation Review Board.

Returned without Action. Concept application for new rear dormer has been inactive for an extended period of time.

Returned without Action. Permit application for exterior lighting has been inactive for an extended period of time.

Returned without Action. Concept application for alterations has been inactive for an extended period of time.

Returned without Action. Submitted materials and a site visit on 11 May 2016 indicate that revisions to permit for new rear bay at second floor would not be visible from a public thoroughfare. Refer to Historic Preservation Review Board.

Returned without Action. Submission materials and a site visit on 16 May 2016 indicate that reconstructed rear brick garden wall would not be visible from a public thoroughfare. Refer to the Historic Preservation Review Boards.

Returned without Action. Submission materials and a site visit on 16 May 2016 indicate that replacement fenestration at rear would not be visible from a public thoroughfare. Refer to the Historic Preservation Review Boards.

Returned without Action. Submission materials and a site visit on 17 May 2016 indicate that rear alterations would not be visible from a public thoroughfare. Refer to the Historic Preservation Review Boards.

Returned without Action. Submission materials and a site visit on 16 May 2016 indicate that existing rooftop mechanical equipment would not be visible from a public thoroughfare. Refer to the Historic Preservation Review Boards.

Returned without Action. Permit drawings and site visit on 21 April 2016 indicate the proposed rear yard site work and new pool house would not be visible from a public thoroughfare. Refer to the Historic Preservation Review Board.

Returned without Action. Permit drawings and a site visit on 22 March 2016 indicate that fenestration alterations would not be visible from a public thoroughfare. Refer to Historic Preservation Review Board.