Old Georgetown Appendix: CFA Meeting — 19 January 2012

No objection to concept design for proposed alterations to rear garage structure as shown in supplemental drawings dated 21 December 2011, including partial demolition, reconstruction with enlarged footprint towards the alley and gable roof with shed dormers. Recommend further study of height of ridge and eave not to exceed nearby garage structures on north side of alley, configuration of dormers, detailing of all dormers. Recommend a trellis representing a garden structure rather than a connector. File new submission of working drawings, including details, dimensions, mechanical equipment and cut-sheets, with permit application for review by the Commission.

Returned without Action. Submission materials indicate that proposed replacement brick garden wall at rear will not be visible from public thoroughfare. Refer to the Historic Preservation Review Board.

No objection to issuance of permit to replace painted tin roof to match existing, including dormers and rear ell.

Returned without Action. Submitted materials and a site visit of 28 December 2011 indicate that proposed alterations to historic building for new garage door opening will not be visible from public thoroughfare, except when the gate is open. The Commission notes that during the concept review for the rear addition (OG 06-216) there was a similar proposal for the basement of the historic house and it was not approved as the conversion of existing historic fabric in houses for garages is highly unusual in Georgetown and historically inappropriate, regardless of visibility. In addition, the concomitant amount of paving is not consistent with the site alterations advocated by the Commission.

Returned without Action. A site visit of 19 December 2011 and submission materials indicate that proposed replacement brick garden wall at rear will not be visible from a public thoroughfare. Refer to the Historic Preservation Review Board.

Returned without Action. Permit application for fence at rear alley was withdrawn by written request of applicant dated 7 January 2012.

No objection to issuance of permit for proposed alterations, including replacement retractable awning, deck, fence and gates at rear, and for replacement shutters and light fixture on front facade as shown in supplemental drawings dated 11 January 2012 which indicate gates are no taller than existing wood fence. Wood fence and gates must be painted or stained. Note: Any subsequent modifications to the exterior design made during DCRA technical review must be re-submitted to the Commission for approval prior to issuance of permit.

Returned without Action. Submitted materials and a site visit of 14 November 2011 indicated that the proposed rear fence will not be visible from a public thoroughfare. Refer to the Historic Preservation Review Board. Any revisions to the footprint, massing, and scope of the project as proposed in the drawings dated 10 November 2011 must be re-submitted to the Commission to reconfirm no visibility from public thoroughfare. See case OG 12-028.

No objection to issuance of permit for proposed replacement of overhead garage door with carriage house style wood door and fixed panels as shown in supplemental drawings dated 21 December 2011 which indicate light fixtures that shine down. New door and panels must be painted. Note: Any subsequent modifications to the exterior design made during DCRA technical review must be re-submitted to the Commission for approval prior to issuance of permit. Note: the Foundation for the Preservation of Historic Georgetown holds an easement on this property.

No objection to issuance of permit for proposed alterations and sign scheme for 'Macaron Bee' including blade sign and awning and casement windows as shown in supplemental drawings dated 17 January 2012 which indicate awning covering window trim., in-swing casement, and PROVIDED either the blade sign or the lettering on awning is installed but not both. Sliding window was not approved and was deleted from this permit application. Alterations to window for a casement window were deleted from this permit application. Note: Any subsequent modifications to the exterior design made during DCRA technical review must be re-submitted to the Commission for approval prior to issuance of permit.

Recommend AGAINST issuance of permit for proposed projecting banner which is not appropriate for the character of the historic building or the district. No objection to issuance of permit for proposed alterations to storefront, including replacement doors and revision to sign scheme to add 'Rag & Bone New York' to the glass on the shop window as shown in supplemental drawings dated 17 January 2012. Existing sign on fascia to remain as is. Existing light fixtures, which were not approved, must be removed no later than 31 March 2012.

No objection to issuance of permit for proposed wood deck to replace existing temporary deck as shown in supplemental drawings dated 17 January 2012 which indicate new door opening on side wall, and use of IPE wood decking and granite pavers. Note: Any subsequent modifications to the exterior design made during DCRA technical review must be re-submitted to the Commission for approval prior to issuance of permit.

No objection to general concept design for proposed sign scheme for 'Flor' to include black back-lit letters on a non-illuminated band and a horizontal blade sign as shown in option 2 of supplemental drawings dated 5 January 2012 provided bar has stainless steel finish. File new submission of detailed and dimensioned drawings for sign scheme with permit application for review by the Commission.

No objection to issuance of permit for rear door alterations and new brick infill per drawings dated 22 December 2011. Note: Any subsequent modifications to the exterior design made during DCRA technical review must be re-submitted to the Commission for approval prior to issuance of permit.

No objection to issuance of permit for proposed steel windows, doors, canopy, cornice, roof deck, pool, and penthouse alterations as shown in drawings dated 18 January 2012. No mechanical equipment, generator, or satellite dishes to project above penthouse coping. North yard and awning alterations have been deleted from this application. Erect full-size electrified cornice mock-up for review by the Old Georgetown Board prior to ordering materials. Note: Any subsequent modifications to the exterior design made during DCRA technical review must be re-submitted to the Commission for approval prior to issuance of permit.

No objection to issuance of permit for repair of existing sandstone steps, new retaining walls and curb along driveway, and sconces at side and rear yards per drawings dated 16 December 2011. Note: Any subsequent modifications to the exterior design made during DCRA technical review must be re-submitted to the Commission for approval prior to issuance of permit.

No objection to issuance of permit for proposed alterations, including replacement windows, doors, deck and fence at rear, and for alterations to door surround and replacement front door as shown in supplemental drawings dated 13 January 2012 which indicate 4 panel door with glazing on top panels lights, 2/2 windows at rear and side of ell with 1 3/4 inch true-divided-lite muntins, wood deck set back from south property line and no light fixtures on deck posts. and reduction on number of light fixtures on rear deck. Rooftop HVAC units and skylights must not be visible from public thoroughfare. Historic wood windows on front facade will be repaired. Wood railing on deck, fence and gate at rear must be painted or stained. Note: Any subsequent modifications to the exterior design made during DCRA technical review must be re-submitted to the Commission for approval prior to issuance of permit.

No objection to issuance of permit to replace front door with triple-hung single-glazed multi-light window without shutters, remove brick stoop, and add new areaway windows at front and door at side per drawings dated 16 December 2011 and 12 January 2012. Note: Any subsequent modifications to the exterior design made during DCRA technical review must be re-submitted to the Commission for approval prior to issuance of permit.

No objection to issuance of permit for glass and steel doors and conservatory per drawings dated 16 December 2011. Note: Any subsequent modifications to the exterior design made during DCRA technical review must be re-submitted to the Commission for approval prior to issuance of permit.

No objection to issuance of permit for proposed rear additions and alterations as shown in supplemental drawings dated 12 January 2012. Proposed window wells on front yard were not approved and were deleted from this permit application. Note: Any subsequent modifications to the exterior design made during DCRA technical review must be re-submitted to the Commission for approval prior to issuance of permit.

No objection to concept design for proposed alterations to openings on rear and side of main house as shown in supplemental drawings dated 21 December 2011. Removal of chimney was not approved and was deleted from the drawings. Submit additional information for proposed alterations to second floor porch and railing. File new submission of working drawings, including details, dimensions and cut-sheets, with permit application for review by the Commission.

No objection to issuance of permit for wood windows, garage, and cornice alterations at front and wood windows, doors, and projecting bay alterations at rear per drawings dated 13 January 2012. Note: Any subsequent modifications to the exterior design made during DCRA technical review must be re-submitted to the Commission for approval prior to issuance of permit.

No objection to issuance of permit for new rear and rooftop additions and alterations to width of existing garage door and site as per plans dated 6 January 2012 which are consistent with previously approved plans OG 11-183.

Returned without Action. Submission materials and a site visit of 18 January 2012 indicate that proposed alterations for generator within the courtyard of LXR and Nevils Hall will not be visible from public thoroughfare. Refer to the historic Preservation Review Board.

Returned without Action. Submission materials and a site visit of 18 January 2012 indicate that proposed alterations to masonry opening at rear will not be visible from public thoroughfare. Refer to the historic Preservation Review Board. Any alterations to the design that would make the work visible must be resubmitted to the Commission for review prior to issuance of permit.

Returned without Action. Submission materials and a site visit of 18 January 2012 indicate that proposed replacement of metal roof at rear will not be visible from public thoroughfare. Refer to the historic Preservation Review Board. Recommend relocation of rooftop mechanical equipment to a location where it will not be visible from public thoroughfare. Any alterations to the design that would make the work visible must be resubmitted to the Commission for review prior to issuance of permit.

Returned without Action. Submission materials and a site visit of 18 January 2012 indicate that proposed storage sheds installed within Oxygen Tank Courtyard and behind the approved screen wall will not be visible from public thoroughfare. See previous recommendation under case OG 10-189. Refer to the historic Preservation Review Board. Any alterations to the design that would make the work visible must be resubmitted to the Commission for review prior to issuance of permit.

Returned without Action. Submission materials and a site visit of 18 January 2012 indicate that proposed rear addition at second floor level will not be visible from public thoroughfare. Refer to the historic Preservation Review Board.