Other Submissions: OGB Meeting — 4 February 2016

Returned without Action. Permit application for fenestration alterations has been inactive for an extended period of time. Note: Any subsequent modifications to the approved design, including those made during DCRA technical review, must be resubmitted to the Commission for approval.

Returned without Action. Permit application for gas light fixture has been inactive for an extended period of time. Note: Any subsequent modifications to the approved design, including those made during DCRA technical review, must be resubmitted to the Commission for approval prior to the issuance of a permit.

Returned without Action. Permit application for sheds (trash receptacle enclosures), trellis, and site work has been inactive for an extended period of time. Note: Any subsequent modifications to the approved design, including those made during DCRA technical review, must be resubmitted to the Commission for approval prior to the issuance of a permit.

Returned without Action. Concept application for new construction has been inactive for an extended period of time.

Returned without Action. Permit application for replacement windows has been inactive for an extended period of time. Note: Any subsequent modifications to the approved design, including those made during DCRA technical review, must be resubmitted to the Commission for approval prior to the issuance of a permit.

Returned without Action. Permit application for decal signs has been inactive for an extended period of time. The Commission regrets that the decal signs were installed prior to review or permit. Note: Any subsequent modifications to the approved design, including those made during DCRA technical review, must be resubmitted to the Commission for approval prior to the issuance of a permit.

Returned without Action. Permit application was withdrawn at the written request by the applicant.

Returned without Action. Permit application for new ATM, awning, signs and light fixtures was deleted at the written request by the applicant. Note: Any subsequent modifications to the approved design, including those made during DCRA technical review, must be resubmitted to the Commission for approval prior to the issuance of a permit.

Returned without Action. Submitted materials and a site visit of 20 January 2016 indicate that proposed 6-feet-tall fence would not be visible from a public thoroughfare. Refer to the Historic Preservation Review Board. Note: Any subsequent modifications to the approved design, including those made during DCRA technical review, must be resubmitted to the Commission for approval prior to the issuance of a permit.

Returned without Action. Submitted materials and a site visit of 20 January 2016 indicate that proposed replacement fence would not be visible from a public thoroughfare. Refer to the Historic Preservation Review Board. Note: Any subsequent modifications to the approved design, including those made during DCRA technical review, must be resubmitted to the Commission for approval prior to the issuance of a permit.

Returned without Action. Submitted materials and a site visit of 20 January 2016 indicate that proposed alterations to basement window at rear elevation would not be visible from a public thoroughfare. Refer to the Historic Preservation Review Board. Note: Any subsequent modifications to the approved design, including those made during DCRA technical review, must be resubmitted to the Commission for approval prior to the issuance of a permit.